Tonight we take a look our second look at the price of Baseball Cards, specifically Topps Cards. We will take a look at the price of 2014 Topps versus some different Topps sets that have been produced over the lasr 40+ years.
Column B is the Price of a Pack in the referenced year.
Column C is the number of cards in that pack.
Column D is what a 12 card pack would cost (Everything is relative to 2012 Topps Cards)
In Column E I produce the cost for a 660 card set build from 12 card packs under perfect collation. I used 660 cards as a constant because it was the basic set size in 2012.
Column F in red is the Inflation factor. This is the Key to the chart. 2012=$1. That dollar is worth 96 cents today, but in 1972 a single dollar had the buying power equivalent to $5.49 in 2012 dollars.
Column H is the price of a 12 card pack with the inflation adjustment (product of columns D*F)
Column I is similar to H but for the 660 card set.
-To build a 660 card 2015 base set via Topps $1.99 12 card retail packs would cost 105.77 .
-This Year there is 701 cards in the base set. Under perfect collation it would cost $116.25 to build that set. The cost would be 111.58 in 2012 Dollars.
-While building a 660 card set would cost one about 3 times as much as it did in 1972, the price of building a set really hasn't changed since 1995.
-I understand there are inserts and possible collation issues. I say trade your inserts for base cards.
-The cost of 660 cards is slightly cheaper each of the last 2 years because Topps has maintained the pack size and price point while inflation has been slight.
-Cards are cheaper then a decade ago by over 30%!!
-This is because Topps went from a 10 card pack to 12 card packs AND reduced the price
-Despite Topps obtaining a monopoly on the MLB license prices have dropped 16% since 2008. This is a difference of over $20 when building a 660 card set.
Sources & Links
2014 Topps Cost Analysis
Pack Prices 1997- present Baseballcardpedia
Pack Prices 1979-1995 - ebay (shown on retail boxes)
Pack Price 1972 my memory - Could be wrong on this one